Servicio de Dispensación: un servicio esencial brindado desde la Farmacia Comunitaria que permite reforzar la Seguridad del Paciente. A propósito de un caso / Dispensing Service: An Essential Service Provided by Community Pharmacy to Enhance Patient Safety. A Case Study

Paciente de 38 años, diagnosticado de asma y ansiedad que utilizaba 2 medicamentos (salbutamol 100 mcg inhalador (2 pulv. cada 6 horas) y diazepam 5 mg (0-0-1)), acude a la Farmacia Comunitaria (FC) para retirar un tratamiento prescrito por el Médico de Atención Primaria (MAP) tras diagnóstico de un cuadro ansioso-depresivo. Desde el Servicio de Dispensación (SD) se detectó un Problema Relacionado con el Medicamento (PRM) de un potencial error en la prescripción, que podría tener asociado un Resultado Negativo asociado a la Medicación (RNM) ante uso concomitante de desvenlafaxina y mirtazapina, así como un PRM de Problema de Salud (PS) insuficientemente tratado ante una propuesta de suspensión de uso de diazepam, que podría derivar en un RNM de Necesidad de Tratamiento ante el riesgo de empeoramiento de episodios de ansiedad. Desde la FC, se elaboró un informe de derivación con recomendaciones que fueron aceptadas por el MAP. Se llevó a cabo un seguimiento del caso que permitió realizar un mejor control de los PS presentados por el paciente, así como la resolución de los PRM y RNM detectados, garantizando así un uso racional, seguro y eficaz del medicamento. (AU)

A 38-year-old patient diagnosed with asthma and anxiety, who takes two medications (salbutamol 100 mcg inhaler (2 puffs every 6 hours), and diazepam 5 mg (0-0-1), visited the Community Pharmacy to pick up a treatment prescribed by the Primary Care Physician (PCP) following a diagnosis of anxious-depressive symptoms. During the Dispensing Service, a potential Drug-Related Problem (DRP) of prescription error is detected, which could be related with a Negative Outcomes Releated to Medicines (NOM) due to the concurrent use of desvenlafaxine and mirtazapine. Additionally, a Health Problem (HP)-related DRP was detected, as the proposal to discontinue the use of diazepam could result in an Insufficiently Treated HP, potentially leading to a NOM of Treatment Necessity due to the risk of worsening anxiety episodes. From de Community Pharmacy, a report was prepared with recommendations that were accepted by the PCP. Subsequent case monitoring revealed an improved management of the patient’s health problems, as well as the resolution of the identified DRP and NOM. This ensured a rational, safe, and effective use of the medication. (AU)

Errores de medicación en niños que acuden a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas / Medication errors in children visiting pediatric emergency departments

Objetivos: la seguridad de los medicamentos en pediatría supone un verdadero reto. Se dispone de escasos estudios que hayan analizado los errores de medicación en los pacientes pediátricos que acuden a los servicios de urgencias. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido caracterizar los errores detectados en estos pacientes, determinando su gravedad, los procesos afectados, los medicamentos implicados y los tipos de errores y causas asociados. Métodos: estudio multicéntrico observacional prospectivo realizado en los servicios de urgencias de 8 hospitales públicos españoles durante 4 meses. Los errores de medicación detectados por los pediatras de urgencias en pacientes entre 0 y 16 años fueron evaluados por un farmacéutico y un pediatra. Los errores de medicación fueron analizados utilizando la Taxonomía Española de Errores de Medicación actualizada. Resultados: en 99.797 visitas a urgencias se detectaron 218 (0,2%) errores de medicación, de los cuales 74 (33,9%) causaron daños (eventos adversos por medicamentos). Los preescolares fueron el grupo poblacional con mayor número de errores de medicación (126/218). Los errores se originaron mayoritariamente en la prescripción (66,1%), por automedicación (16,5%) y por administración equivocada por parte de los familiares (15,6%). Los tipos de errores más frecuentes fueron: «dosis incorrectas» (51,4%) y «medicamento inapropiado» (46,8%). Los antiinfecciosos (63,5%) fueron los fármacos más comúnmente implicados en los errores con daño. Las causas subyacentes asociadas a una mayor proporción de errores de medicación fueron: «falta de conocimiento del medicamento» (63,8%), «falta de seguimiento de los procedimientos» (48,6%) y «falta de información del paciente» (30,3%). Conclusiones: los errores de medicación en la población pediátrica que acude a urgencias se producen en la prescripción, por automedicación y en la administración, provocando daños a los pacientes en un tercio de las ocasiones. ...(AU)

Objectives: Medication safety represents an important challenge in children. There are limited studies on medication errors in pediatric patients visiting emergency departments. To help bridge this gap, we characterized the medication errors detected in these patients, determining their severity, the stages of the medication process in which they occurred, the drugs involved, and the types and causes associated with the errors. Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study in the pediatric emergency departments of 8 Spanish public hospitals over a 4-month period. Medication errors detected by emergency pediatricians in patients between 0 and 16 years of age were evaluated by a clinical pharmacist and a pediatrician. Each medication error was analyzed according to the updated Spanish Taxonomy of Medication Errors. Results: In 99,797 visits to pediatric emergency departments, 218 (0.2%) medication errors were detected, of which 74 (33.9%) resulted in harm (adverse drug events). Preschoolers were the age group with the most medication errors (126/218). Errors originated mainly in the prescribing stage (66.1%), and also by self-medication (16.5%) and due to wrong administration of the medication by family members (15.6%). Dosing errors (51.4%) and wrong/improper drugs (46.8%) were the most frequent error types. Anti-infective drugs (63.5%) were the most common drugs implicated in medication errors with harm. Underlying causes associated with a higher proportion of medication errors were “medication knowledge deficit” (63.8%), “deviation from procedures/guidelines” (48.6%) and “lack of patient information” (30.3%). Conclusions: Medication errors presented by children attending emergency departments arise from prescriptions, self-medication, and administration, and lead to patient harm in one third of cases. Developing effective interventions based on the types of errors and the underlying causes identified will improve patient safety. (AU)

Disminución de errores de medicación Look-Alike Sound-Alike, mediante la implementación de estrategias preventivas en una clínica de III nivel Barranquilla-Colombia / Decrease in Look-Alike Sound-Alike, medication errors through the implementation of preventive strategies in a third level clinic from Barranquilla-Colombia

Los medicamentos Look-Alike and Sound-Alike (LASA) son frecuentemente causantes de errores de medicación en el proceso de dispensación, con importantes repercusiones desde el punto de vista humano, asistencial y económico.Objetivo: Determinar la disminución de tasa de estos errores de medicación LASA, posterior a la implementación de estrategias de prevención en una clínica de tercer nivel en Barranquilla, Colombia.Método: La investigación fue de tipo experimental, prospectivo; el periodo de estudio fue de 3 meses (enero-marzo 2021); el criterio de inclusión para el estudio fueron los medicamentos del listado básico de medicamentos LASA y los errores de medicación ocasionados por estos. Se implementaron estrategias de prevención de errores tipo LASA, se cuantificó y comparó los errores de medicación presentados antes y después de la implementación de las estrategias. Resultados: En la etapa de pre-implementación de las estrategias se dispensaron 24.300 medicamentos, entre los cuales se presentaron 80 (0,33%) errores de medicación por medicamentos LASA. En la etapa de post-implementación se dispensaron 23.760 medicamentos, y se presentaron 48 (0,20%) errores de medicación por medicamentos LASA, evidenciando una reducción significativa (P-valor: 0,0366314; IC: 95%). Los medicamentos con mismo principio activo y diferente concentración fueron los de mayor incidencia de errores de medicación en el Servicio Farmacéutico, con 37 errores en la etapa de pre-implementación y 19 errores en la etapa de post-implementación.Conclusión: La reducción de la tasa de errores de medicación fue del 40% al implementar las estrategias propuestas, lo que demuestra su efectividad y su potencial para ofrecer una atención más segura y de mayor calidad a los pacientes, a bajo costo. (AU)

Look-Alike and Sound-Alike (LASA) drugs are frequently the cause of medication errors in the dispensing process, with important repercussions from the human, healthcare and economic point of view.Objective: To determine the decrease in the rate of these LASA medication errors, after the implementation of prevention strategies in a third-level clinic in Barranquilla, Colombia. Method: The research was experimental, prospective; the study period was 3 months (January-March 2021); the inclusion criteria for the study were drugs from the clinic’s basic list of drugs that were LASA and the medication errors caused by these. LASA error prevention strategies were implemented; the medication errors presented before and after the implementation of the strategies were quantified and compared.Results: In the pre-implementation stage of the strategies, 24,300 medications were dispensed, among which there were 80 (0.33%) medication errors due to LASA medications. In the post-implementation stage, 23,760 medications were dispensed, and 48 (0.20%) medication errors occurred due to LASA medications, showing a significant reduction (P-valor: 0.0366314; IC: 95%). Medicines with the same active ingredient and different concentrations were those with the highest incidence of medication errors in the Pharmaceutical Service, with 37 errors in the pre-implementation stage and 19 errors in the post-implementation stage.Conclusion: The reduction in the rate of medication errors was 40% after implementing the proposed strategies, which demonstrates their effectiveness and their potential to offer a safer and higher quality care to patients, at low cost. (AU)

Medication-related adverse events in health care-what have we learned? A narrative overview of the current knowledge.

PURPOSE: Although medication-related adverse events (MRAEs) in health care are vastly studied, high heterogeneity in study results complicates the interpretations of the current situation. The main objective of this study was to form an up-to-date overview of the current knowledge of the prevalence, risk factors, and surveillance of MRAEs in health care. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched with applicable search terms to collect information on medication-related adverse events. In order to obtain an up-to-date view of MRAEs, only studies published after 2000 were accepted. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of different MRAEs vary greatly between individual studies and meta-analyses. Study setting, patient population, and detection methods play an important role in determining detection rates, which should be regarded while interpreting the results. Medication-related adverse events are more common in elderly patients and patients with lowered liver or kidney function, polypharmacy, and a large number of additional comorbidities. However, the risk of MRAEs is also significantly increased by the use of high-risk medicines but also in certain care situations. Preventing MRAEs is important as it will decrease patient mortality and morbidity but also reduce costs and functional challenges related to them. CONCLUSIONS: Medication-related adverse events are highly common and have both immediate and long-term effects to patients and healthcare systems worldwide. Conclusive solutions for prevention of all medication-related harm are impossible to create. In the future, however, the development of efficient real-time detection methods can provide significant improvements for event prevention and forecasting.

Eventos adversos em uma unidade de internação psiquiátrica / Eventos adversos en una unidad de hospitalización psiquiátrica / Adverse events in a psychiatric hospitalization unit

RESUMO Objetivo descrever os eventos adversos presentes na internação psiquiátrica, analisando-os à luz da teoria do erro humano. Método pesquisa qualitativa, realizada em 2018 em um hospital psiquiátrico. Os dados foram coletados por entrevistas semiestruturadas com 15 profissionais de saúde da equipe multidisciplinar. A análise foi lexical por meio do software Alceste. Resultados evidenciaram-se eventos adversos medicamentosos por erros de administração ou por reações adversas a medicamentos, que produzem danos como impregnação, reações extrapiramidais associadas aos riscos de queda e broncoaspiração pela sonolência e/ou sedação. Outros danos relacionam-se à agressividade do paciente, que produz lesões corporais a si ou a outro, como durante uma tentativa de suicídio ou uso de violência como comportamento de fuga ou defesa. Considerações finais e implicações para a prática existem eventos adversos mais comuns nos ambientes de internação psiquiátrica que precisam ser de conhecimento da equipe de saúde mental porque demandam ações de mitigação por meio do fortalecimento dos sistemas de segurança do paciente. Os dados subsidiam ações para o fortalecimento dos sistemas de segurança nos ambientes de internação psiquiátrica e contribuem à reflexão do conceito de segurança do paciente na psiquiatria.

RESUMEN Objetivo describir los eventos adversos presentes en la hospitalización psiquiátrica, analizándolos a la luz de la teoría del error humano. Método investigación cualitativa, realizada en 2018 en un hospital psiquiátrico. Los datos se recolectaron a través de entrevistas semiestructuradas con 15 profesionales de la salud del equipo multidisciplinario. Se llevó a cabo el análisis léxico por medio del software Alceste. Resultados se evidenciaron eventos adversos por errores de administración o reacciones adversas al fármaco, que producen daños como impregnación y reacciones extrapiramidales asociadas al riesgo de caídas y broncoaspiración por somnolencia y / o sedación. Otros daños se relacionan con agresividad por parte del paciente, que produce daño corporal a sí mismo o a otro, como durante un intento de suicidio o uso de violencia como conducta de fuga o defensa. Conclusión e implicaciones para la práctica hay eventos adversos más comunes en entornos de hospitalización psiquiátrica que deben ser conocidos por el equipo de salud mental porque exigen acciones de mitigación a través del fortalecimiento de los sistemas de seguridad del paciente. Los datos reflejan la necesidad de implementar acciones para fortalecer los sistemas de seguridad en entornos de hospitalización psiquiátrica y contribuyen a la reflexión del concepto de seguridad del paciente en psiquiatría.

ABSTRACT Objective to describe the adverse events found in psychiatric hospitalization, analyzing them in the light of the human error theory. Method a qualitative research study, carried out in 2018 in a psychiatric hospital. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 health professionals from the multidisciplinary team. Analysis was of the lexical type using the Alceste software. Results adverse drug events were evidenced due to administration errors or adverse drug reactions, which produce harms such as impregnation and extrapyramidal reactions associated with the risks for falls and bronchoaspiration due to drowsiness and/or sedation. Other harms are related to the patient's aggressiveness, which produce bodily self-harm or harms to another person, such as during a suicide attempt or use of violence as an escape or defense behavior. Conclusion and implications for the practice some adverse events are more frequent in psychiatric hospitalization settings; such events need to be known by the mental health team, as they require mitigation actions through the strengthening of patient safety systems. The data subsidize actions for strengthening safety systems in psychiatric hospitalization settings and contribute to reflecting on the concept of patient safety in Psychiatry.

Effect of electronic medication reconciliation at the time of hospital discharge on inappropriate medication use in the community: an interrupted time-series analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if enhanced electronic medication reconciliation systems can reduce inappropriate medication use and improve patient care. We evaluated trends in potentially inappropriate medication use after hospital discharge before and after adoption of an electronic medication reconciliation system. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis in 3 tertiary care hospitals in London, Ontario, using linked health care data (2011-2019). We included patients aged 66 years and older who were discharged from hospital. Starting between Apr. 13 and May 21, 2014, physicians were required to complete an electronic medication reconciliation module for each discharged patient. As a process outcome, we evaluated the proportion of patients who continued to receive a benzodiazepine, antipsychotic or gastric acid suppressant as an outpatient when these medications were first started during the hospital stay. The clinical outcome was a return to hospital within 90 days of discharge with a fall or fracture among patients who received a new benzodiazepine or antipsychotic during their hospital stay. We used segmented linear regression for the analysis. RESULTS: We identified 15 932 patients with a total of 18 405 hospital discharge episodes. Before the implementation of the electronic medication reconciliation system, 16.3% of patients received a prescription for a benzodiazepine, antipsychotic or gastric acid suppressant after their hospital stay. After implementation, there was a significant and immediate 7.0% absolute decline in this proportion (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5% to 9.5%). Before implementation, 4.1% of discharged patients who newly received a benzodiazepine or antipsychotic returned to hospital with a fracture or fall within 90 days. After implementation, there was a significant and immediate 2.3% absolute decline in this outcome (95% CI 0.3% to 4.3%). INTERPRETATION: Implementation of an electronic medication reconciliation system in 3 tertiary care hospitals reduced potentially inappropriate medication use and associated adverse events when patients transitioned back to the community. Enhanced electronic medication reconciliation systems may allow other hospitals to improve patient safety.

Prescribing Errors With Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Their Impact on the Risk of Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulants are associated with significant harm when used in error, but there are limited data on potential harm of inappropriate treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We conducted a matched case-control study among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients admitting the hospital with a chronic treatment with DOACs, in order to assess factors associated with the risk of major bleeding. METHODS: Patient data were documented using hospital's computerized provider order entry system. Patients identified with major bleeding were defined as cases and were matched with controls based on the duration of treatment with DOACs and number of chronic medications. Appropriateness of prescribing was assessed based on the relevant clinical guidelines. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the potential impact of safety-relevant prescribing errors with DOACs on major bleeding. RESULTS: A total number of 509 eligible admissions were detected during the study period, including 64 cases of major bleeding and 445 controls. The prevalence of prescribing errors with DOACs was 33%. Most prevalent prescribing errors with DOACs were "drug dose too low" (16%) and "non-recommended combination of drugs" (11%). Safety-relevant prescribing errors with DOACs were associated with major bleeding [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-4.12]. CONCLUSION: Prescribers should be aware of the potential negative impact of prescribing errors with DOACs and understand the importance of proper prescribing and regular follow-up.

Evaluación de una intervención para mejora en la administración segura de medicación en el turno de noche / An Intervention to Improve Safe Administration of Medication in the Night Shift

Introducción: Uno de cada siete pacientes hospitalizados experimenta un evento adverso relacionado con la administración de medicación. Los errores de medicación son una de las causas más importantes de mortalidad y morbilidad prevenible. Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia de una intervención formativa sobre la población de enfermeras de turno de noche de un hospital de agudos para mejorar el cumplimiento del protocolo de administración segura de medicación. Métodos: Ensayo experimental, pre-post intervención formativa, realizado en Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, durante 2015-2016. Población: 268 enfermeras en dos turnos de noche, muestra: 177 participantes (88 Grupo Control y 89 Grupo Experimental). La intervención consistió en sesiones informativas y acceso a Procedimiento escrito. El instrumento de medida fue el Procedimiento Normalizado de Trabajo de la institución mediante check-list de cumplimiento. Se realzó estudio uni-bivariable, mediante Chi2 y test de Fisher con significancia para p < 0,05. Resultados: Se realizaron 219 observaciones en Grupo Control y 207 en Grupo Experimental. De 17 variables analizadas, solo tres mostraron diferencias significativas: en Grupo Experimental mejoró el conocimiento del Procedimiento; se incrementó el uso del agua y jabón sobre la solución hidroalcohólica; y empeoró la identificación normalizada de fármacos pendientes de administrar. Ninguna de las 14 variables restantes mostró diferencias significativas. De 426 observaciones, solo se produjeron 3 errores de medicación en Grupo control, subsanados antes de su administración, y 0 en Grupo Experimental. Conclusiones: Las intervenciones formativas clásicas con receptores pasivos pueden no ser eficaces para mejorar la práctica enfermera en administración segura de medicación(AU)

Introduction: One in seven hospitalized patients experiences an adverse event related to administration of medication. Medication errors are one of the most important causes of preventable mortality and morbidity. Objective: To assess the efficacy of a training intervention with the population of night shift nurses in an acute care hospital, in order to improve compliance with the protocol for the safe administration of medication. Methods: Experimental trial, pre-post training intervention, carried out at Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, during 2015-2016. The population consisted of 268 nurses in two night shifts. The sample consisted of 177 participants (88 from the control group and 89 from the experimental group). The intervention consisted in information sessions and access to a written procedure. The measurement instrument was the Institution's Standard Work Procedure by means of a compliance check-list. Uni-bivariate study was performed, using chi-square and Fisher's test with a significance of P < 0.05. Results: 219 observations were carried out in the control group and 207, in the experimental group. Of seventeen variables analyzed, only three showed significant differences: in the experimental group, knowledge of the procedure improved, increase in the use of soap and water over hydroalcoholic solution, and worsening of standardized identification of drugs pending from being administered. None of the fourteen remaining variables showed significant differences. Of 426 observations, only three medication errors occurred in the control group, corrected before its administration, and zero occurred in the experimental group. Conclusions: Classic training interventions with passive receptors may not be effective to improve nursing practice in safe administration of medication(AU)

The Queensland Inpatient Diabetes Survey (QuIDS) 2019: the bedside audit of practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of care for patients with diabetes in Queensland hospitals, including blood glucose control, rates of hospital-acquired harm, the incidence of insulin prescription and management errors, and appropriate foot and peri-operative care. DESIGN, SETTING: Cross-sectional audit of 27 public hospitals in Queensland: four of five tertiary/quaternary referral centres, four of seven large regional or outer metropolitan hospitals, seven of 13 smaller outer metropolitan or small regional hospitals, and 12 of 88 hospitals in rural or remote locations. PARTICIPANTS: 850 adult inpatients with diabetes mellitus in medical, surgical, mental health, high dependency, or intensive care wards. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 115 public hospitals that admit acute inpatients participated in the audit, including 4175 of 6652 eligible acute hospital beds in Queensland. A total of 1003 patients had diabetes (24%), and data were collected for 850 (85%). Their mean age was 65.9 years (SD, 15.1 years), 357 were women (42%), and their mean HbA1c level was 66 mmol/mol (SD, 26 mmol/mol). Rates of good diabetes days (appropriate monitoring, no more than one blood glucose measurement greater than 10 mmol/L, and none below 5 mmol/L) were low in patients with type 1 diabetes (22.1 per 100 patient-days) or type 2 diabetes treated with insulin (40.1 per 100 patient-days); hypoglycaemia rates were high for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (24.1 episodes per 100 patient-days). One or more medication errors were identified for 201 patients (32%), including insulin prescribing errors for 127 patients (39%). Four patients with type 1 diabetes experienced diabetic ketoacidosis in hospital (8%); 121 patients (14%) met the criteria for review by a specialist diabetes team but were not reviewed by any diabetes specialist (medical, nursing, allied health). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several deficits in inpatient diabetes management in Queensland, including high rates of medication error and hospital-acquired harm and low rates of appropriate glycaemic control, particularly for patients treated with insulin. These deficits require attention, and ongoing evaluation of outcomes is necessary.

Medication discrepancies in transition of care of hospitalised children in Brazil: a multicentric study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of medication discrepancies in transition points of care of hospitalised children. DESIGN: A prospective observational multicentre study was carried out between February and August 2019. Data collection consisted of the following steps: sociodemographic data collection, clinical interview with the patient's caregiver, review of patient prescriptions and evaluation of medical records. Medication discrepancies were classified as intentional (documented or undocumented) and unintentional. In addition, discrepancies identified were categorised according to the medication discrepancy taxonomy. Unintentional discrepancies were assessed for potential clinical harm to the patient. SETTING: Paediatric clinics of four teaching hospitals in Brazil. PATIENTS: Children aged 1 month-12 years. FINDINGS: A total of 248 children were included, 77.0% (n=191) patients had at least one intentional discrepancy; 20.2% (n=50) patients had at least one unintended discrepancy and 15.3% (n=38) patients had at least one intentional discrepancy and an unintentional one. The reason for the intentional discrepancy was not documented in 49.6% (n=476) of the cases. The most frequent unintentional discrepancy was medication omission (54.1%; n=66). Low potential to cause discomfort was found in 53 (43.4%) unintentional discrepancies, while 55 (45.1%) had the potential to cause moderate discomfort and 14 (11.5%) could potentially cause severe discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Although most medication discrepancies were intentional, the majority of these were not documented by the healthcare professionals. Unintentional discrepancies were often related to medication omission and had a potential risk of causing harm to hospitalised children.

Cuidado de enfermagem seguro: processo de medicação em terapia intensiva / Safe nursing care: medication process in intensive care / Atención de enfermería segura: proceso de medicación en cuidados intensivos

Objetivo: evidenciar os fatores intervenientes para a segurança do cuidado de enfermagem durante o processo de medicação em unidade de terapia intensiva. Método: estudo descritivo de abordagem qualitativa. Realizou-se a pesquisa na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Adulto, de um Hospital de Ensino da região norte do estado do Ceará, com sete profissionais, sendo estes quatro técnicas de enfermagem e três enfermeiras. Resultados: identificou-se que a prescrição eletrônica, o sistema operacional utilizado no hospital e as abreviações são fatores relacionados à prescrição que dificulta o processo de medicação. A estrutura física foi evidenciada como fator que interfere na diluição, enquanto que o fluxo da instituição interfere nos cuidados de enfermagem. Conclusão: os serviços de saúde que queiram oferecer uma assistência segura para seus pacientes devem focar suas estratégias na medicação por ser a forma mais comum de intervenção do cuidado à saúde e a causa mais comum de eventos adversos, sendo muitos deles evitáveis.(AU)

Objective: to highlight the intervening factors for the safety of nursing care during the medication process in intensive care units. Method: descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The research was conducted in the Adult Intensive Care Unit of a Teaching Hospital in the northern region of the state of Ceará, with seven professionals, four nursing technicians and three nurses. Results: we identified that the electronic prescription, the operating system used in the hospital and abbreviations are factors related to the prescription that hinders the medication process. The physical structure was highlighted as a factor that interferes with dilution, while the flow of the institution interferes with nursing care. Conclusion: health services that want to offer safe care to their patients should focus their strategies on medication because it is the most common form of health care intervention and the most common cause of adverse events, many of them avoidable.(AU)

Objetivo: señalar los factores que intervienen en la seguridad de la atención de enfermería durante el proceso de medicación en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Método: estudio descriptivo con enfoque cualitativo. La investigación se realizó en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Adultos de un Hospital Escuela de la región norte del estado de Ceará, con siete profesionales, cuatro técnicos de enfermería y tres enfermeros. Resultados: se identificó que la prescripción electrónica, el sistema operacional utilizado en el hospital y las abreviaturas son factores relacionados con la prescripción que dificultan el proceso de medicación. La estructura física se señaló como un factor que interfiere con la dilución, mientras que el flujo de la institución interfiere con la atención de enfermería. Conclusión: los servicios sanitarios que quieran ofrecer una atención segura a sus pacientes deben centrar sus estrategias en la medicación, ya que es la forma más común de intervención sanitaria y la causa más frecuente de eventos adversos, muchos de los cuales son prevenibles.(AU)

Correlation of Estimated Creatinine Clearance and Glomerular Filtration Rate in Very Elderly Patients and Antibiotic Prescribing Errors: Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Determination of renal function is particularly important when prescribing antibiotics to elderly patients. This study aims to determine the correlation between estimated creatinine clearance and the estimated glomerular filtration rate, for a hospitalized population of very elderly patients, and to audit antibiotic prescribing errors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients ≥ 80 years hospitalized with antibiotic. Creatinine clearance was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation and estimated glomerular filtration rate by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations. Dosing errors were determined through adjustment of daily define dose to renal function. RESULTS: The study included 589 patients. The correlation of Cockcroft-Gault with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration was r = 0.98 and 0.96 for the minimum serum creatinine, and 0.97 and 0.93 for the maximum serum creatinine. Based on Cockcroft-Gault, there were errors in the daily defined dose in 45% in the minimum serum creatinine, and 52% in the maximum serum creatinine day. There was a discrepancy in the recording of errors of 14% to 16% when Cockcroft-Gault was compared with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. DISCUSSION: There was a good correlation of Cockcroft-Gault with the estimated glomerular filtration rate by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease or Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Regardless of the equation used to estimate renal function there was a high rate of antibiotic dosing errors documented in this population. CONCLUSION: This study supports the maintenance of the Cockcroft-Gault equation for drug dosing in the very elderly population. Further studies are needed to investigate underlying causes of prescribing errors.

Introdução: A determinação da função renal é particularmente importante na prescrição de antibióticos em doentes idosos. O objetivo deste estudo é correlacionar a clearance de creatinina com a taxa de filtração glomerular estimada, numa população hospitalizada de doentes muito idosos, e auditar os erros de prescrição antibiótica. Material e Métodos: Coorte retrospetivo de todos os doentes ≥ 80 anos hospitalizados com antibioterapia prescrita. A clearance de creatinina foi calculada através da equação Cockcroft-Gault, e a filtração glomerular estimada através das equações Modification of Diet in Renal Disease e Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Os erros de prescrição foram determinados pelo ajuste da dose diária definida à função renal. Resultados: Foram incluídos 589 doentes. A correlação da Cockcroft-Gault com Modification of Diet in Renal Disease e Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration foi r = 0,98 e 0,96 para a creatinina sérica mínima, e 0,97 e 0,93 para a creatinina sérica máxima. Com base na Cockcroft-Gault, a taxa de erro na dose diária definida foi 45% no dia da creatinina sérica mínima e 52% no dia da creatinina sérica máxima. Quando a Cockcroft-Gault foi comparada com a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease e a Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration houve uma discrepância no registo de erros de 14% a 16%, respetivamente. Discussão: Verificou-se uma boa correlação entre a Cockcroft-Gault e as equações que calculam a filtração glomerular: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease ou Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Independentemente da equação utilizada para estimar a função renal, foi documentada uma taxa elevada de erros na dose de antibióticos prescrita nesta população. Conclusão: Este estudo reforça a manutenção do uso da equação de Cockcroft-Gault para calcular a dose adequada de antibióticos na população muito idosa. Mais estudos são necessários para investigar as causas subjacentes aos erros de prescrição.

Medication discrepancies in a hospital in Southern Brazil: the importance of medication reconciliation for patient safety

Medication discrepancies are of great concern in hospitals because they pose risks to patients and increase health care costs. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of inconsistent medication prescriptions to adult patients admitted to a hospital in southern Santa Catarina, Brazil. This was a patient safety study on patients recruited between November 2015 and June 2016. The participants were interviewed and had their medical records reviewed. Discrepant medications were considered those that did not match between the list of medicines taken at home and the prescribed drugs for treatment in a hospital setting. Of the 394 patients included, 98.5% took continuous-use medications at home, with an average of 5.5 medications per patient. Discrepancies totaled 80.2%, The independent variables associated with the discrepancies were systemic arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, vascular disease, number of medications taken at home, and poor documentation of the medications in the medical record. Findings from this study allowed us to conclude there was a high rate of prescription medication misuse. Medication reconciliation is crucial in reducing these errors. Pharmacists can help reduce these medication-related errors and the associated risks and complications.

Epilepsy trigger factors in Saudi Arabia. A missing part of the puzzle.

OBJECTIVES: To identify epilepsy triggers prevalent in Saudi Arabia with a view to seizure prevention or achieving a reduction in their frequency. METHODS: This is part of a cross-sectional study carried out in 2020 in a Saudi population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). We used an online questionnaire to evaluate the most common seizure trigger factors. RESULTS: A total of 546 Saudi patients with epilepsy participated in the study, of which 289 (53%) were women. Of them, 263 (48.1%) had no seizure in the previous 3 months. One hundred and thirty-six (25%) had a family member with epilepsy. The most-reported trigger factor was sleep deprivation reported by 285 (52%), followed by stress 225 (41%), missed medication 210 (38.5%), anxiety 209 (38.3%), and fatigue 184 (33.7%). Conclusions: Sleep deprivation is the most reported trigger factor for seizures in the KSA, followed by stress, followed by missed medication.

Interruptions Then and Now: Impact on Nurses' Clinical Reasoning, Emotions, and Medication Safety.

Nurses transitioning to care and novice-level nurses experience difficulty managing interruptions in the acute care setting, which can result in loss of attention and potential errors. Understanding better the characteristics surrounding interruptions will better guide staff development educators in designing management strategies as well as improving clinical reasoning that supports a culture of safety among staff and professional partners.

Incidence and prevalence of intravenous medication errors in the UK: a systematic review.

Objectives: Medication error is the most common type of medical error, and intravenous medicines are at a higher risk as they are complex to prepare and administer. The WHO advocates a 50% reduction of harmful medication errors by 2022, but there is a lack of data in the UK that accurately estimates the true rate of intravenous medication errors. This study aimed to estimate the number of intravenous medication errors per 1000 administrations in the UK National Health Service and their associated economic costs. The rate of errors in prescribing, preparation and administration, and rate of different types of errors were also extracted. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane central register of clinical trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and the Health Technology Appraisals Database were searched from inception to July 2017. Epidemiological studies to determine the incidence of intravenous medication errors set wholly or in part in the UK were included. 228 studies were identified, and after screening, eight papers were included, presenting 2576 infusions. Data were reviewed and extracted by a team of five reviewers with discrepancies in data extraction agreed by consensus. Results: Five of eight studies used a comparable denominator, and these data were pooled to determine a weighted mean incidence of 101 intravenous medication errors per 1000 administrations (95% CI 84 to 121). Three studies presented prevalence data but these were based on spontaneous reports only; therefore it did not support a true estimate. 32.1% (95% CI 30.6% to 33.7%) of intravenous medication errors were administration errors and 'wrong rate' errors accounted for 57.9% (95% CI 54.7% to 61.1%) of these. Conclusion: Intravenous medication errors in the UK are common, with half these of errors related to medication administration. National strategies are aimed at mitigating errors in prescribing and preparation. It is now time to focus on reducing administration error, particularly wrong rate errors.

Challenges in ICU Care: The Patient With Parkinson's Disease.

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) face unique challenges when admitted to the hospital. The nature of the disease, complexity of the pharmacotherapeutic home regimens, and the medication-related policies of institutionalized care all contribute to the challenges patients and providers face. In addition, medication errors are common in this population. Incorrectly ordered or omitted home medications or delayed administration can have significant negative consequences including worsening of PD symptoms, dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome, or malignant or hyperpyrexia syndrome. Also, this patient population may commonly encounter contraindicated medications ordered during their hospitalizations. These medication misadventures negatively affect patient care, which may lead to increased length of stay and significant adverse sequalae. Nurses, pharmacists, and other health care providers can help ease the anxiety of patients and their families by taking detailed medication histories, restarting home medication regimens, customizing medication administration to fit patients' needs, and screening patient profiles for drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Education of hospital staff regarding the unique needs of this patient population and seeking the advice of specialists in PD can also promote improved patient care.

Adverse Drug Events in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Multiple Drug Interactions and Polypharmacy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with adverse drug events due to medication errors and the risks of polypharmacy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether multiple pharmacodynamic interactions are a significant problem in CKD patients to improve medication safety. METHODS: The discharge medication of 200 elderly patients with stage 3, 4 and 5/5D CKD was analysed in a retrospective observational study with respect to kidney-related medication errors and multiple pharmacodynamic interactions. The clinical relevance of the most common and hazardous multiple interactions was assessed by evaluating adverse events at the primary or the subsequent hospital stay. RESULTS: Findings showed that 29.5% of the study cohort were at risk of QTc-interval prolongation in association with their medication combinations and half of them exhibited QTc-interval prolongation. The QTc interval was extended among all patients receiving a combination of two or more drugs with 'known' risk of Torsades de pointes. Amiodarone, citalopram and ciprofloxacin turned out to be the most hazardous drugs in this context. Eight percent of the patient population received a regimen of 4-6 potassium-enhancing drugs during their hospital stay, which was not de-escalated in 75.0% in the ambulatory setting. Despite close monitoring in the clinical setting, 37.5% of these patients developed hyperkalaemic episodes during their primary stay and 66.7% during rehospitalization. Of the study cohort, 8.5% received a combination of three drugs with antithrombotic or antiplatelet effects. Of these, 64.7% developed haemorrhagic events with two of them proving fatal. CONCLUSION: Multiple pharmacodynamic interactions related to QTc prolongation, hyperkalaemia and haemorrhage are frequently associated with a negative outcome in older adults with CKD and often require recurrent medical treatment or rehospitalization.